This then leads to the issues of regulations and ethical publishing. While Binderup (2007, p. 405) argues that “from a liberal egalitarian perspective”, ‘freedom of speech’ should prevail despite being culturally offensive, Wallace (1955, p.2) notes that “there are ethical standards which should control any situation in which speaker and writer endeavor to inform and to influence others”. In this case, the Danish newspaper failed to consider the possible reaction from the Muslim community in Denmark which cause them to take the issue to a higher level, in Middle East.
In my opinion, while controversy may lead to high level of publicity, there is a limit and publishers and writers should respect other races and carefully consider the subsequent consequences. Yes, one might think that the issue is not that serious, but because of different ideologies amongst culture, it may lead to rage and anger among many, due to what they perceived. What you and I perceive the cartoon as may be different from others’.
(401 words)
References
Binderup, L. 2007, Global freedom of speech. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 11, 403-418.
Cass, P. 2006, A dozen Danish cartoons and the wrath of the Muslim world, Pacific Journalism Review, 12, 148-154.
Wallace, K. 1955, An ethical basis of communication, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 4, 1-9.